Dark secret chat mobile
I installed the client for the sole reason that your advertising led me to believe there was e2e encryption, and there isn't. @leshow Well, for me personally neither one of "tons of those" is good enough compared to Telegram (that was the reason I've started this desktop client app in the first place).Uniting cloud sync for messages and attachment across all mobile, tablet and desktop devices, very fast and reliable mobile apps, file sharing up to 1.5GB (for a single file), group conversations for up to 200 members, message history search (from the cloud — for all ever sent messages right after sign in on any device).
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with the backend not open sourced, and e2e encryption not implemented, there is no way to verify that "private conversations" really are private?You're not the only one who would like to see this feature.As at the time I was posting this reply, there were 15 open issues asking for this.Unfortunately though the developer does not intend to implement this in the near future.It seems like the best shot at this would be to fork tdesktop and implement secret-chats there.And while I can see you have a bounty for security flaws.
Not being able to see the source means we're just sort of taking your word for it that things really are secure.
@telegramdesktop While it's true that Telegram is probably better than any other IM app out there, encrypted and self-destructing messages are one of the key "selling" points, at least according to the official website.
The main developer doesn't seem to care for Telegram's ability to "Encrypt" and "Destroy" messages (taken from their main website, under the "What can you do with Telegram? Sadly, I'm not a good enough programmer to do this (I can only hope this inspires someone).
The excuse given in other issues (which were closed) makes no sense; first, if one uses Telegram in both a mobile phone and a tablet (just an example) there will be different secret chats in different devices and second, if one thinks people might get confused by seeing different secret chats in different devices, one would solve that problem by educating people on the reasons for such a behaviour, not by removing such a vital feature from Telegram's most emphasized feature is security, it even could be said that it's main guideline of it's philosophy.
So what is exactly TD's deal then — is it to create an inherently insecure implementation of Telegram? My first and unqualified enhancement preference for Telegram Desktop (Ubuntu) is Secret Chats.
Whether or not these are (1) device specific secret chats, (2) potentially group secret chats, or (3) potentially confusing, is of secondary importance. Without e2e encryption you guys are just an instant messenger, there's a ton of those already in existence.